CGM accuracy: Contrasting CE marking with the governmental controls of the USA (FDA) and Australia (TGA): A narrative review.

The National Institute for Clinical Excellence updated guidance for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in 2022, recommending that CGM be available to all people living with type 1 diabetes. Manufacturers can trade in the UK with Conformité Européenne (CE) marking without an initial national assessment. The regulatory process for CGM CE marking, in contrast to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) process, is described. Manufacturers operating in the UK provided clinical accuracy studies submitted for CE marking. Critical appraisal of the studies shows several CGM devices have CE marking for wide-ranging indications beyond available data, unlike FDA and TGA approval. The FDA and TGA use tighter controls, requiring comprehensive product-specific clinical data evaluation. In 2018, the FDA published the integrated CGM (iCGM) criteria permitting interoperability. Applying the iCGM criteria to clinical data provided by manufacturers trading in the UK identified several study protocols that minimized glucose variability, thereby improving CGM accuracy on all metrics. These results do not translate into real-life performance. Furthermore, for many CGM devices available in the UK, accuracy reported in the hypoglycaemic range is below iCGM standards, or measurement is absent. We offer a framework to evaluate CGM accuracy studies critically. The review concludes that FDA- and TGA-approved indications match the available clinical data, whereas CE marking indications can have discrepancies. The UK can bolster regulation with UK Conformity Assessed marking from January 2025. However, balanced regulation is needed to ensure innovation and timely technological access are not hindered.

An effective and cost-saving structured education program teaching dynamic glucose management strategies to a socio-economically deprived cohort with type 1 diabetes in a VIRTUAL setting.

OBJECTIVES: Compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an established face to face (F2F) structured education program to a new remote (VIRTUAL) program teaching dynamic glucose management (DynamicGM) to children and young people with type 1 diabetes (CYPD) using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). To ascertain the most effective DynamicGM strategies predicting time in range (TIR) (3.9-10.0 mmol/L) and incorporating these into a user-friendly teaching aid. DESIGN AND METHODS: Effectiveness of the F2F and VIRTUAL programs were ascertained by comparing the mean change (Δ) from baseline to 6 months in HbA1c, TIR and severe hypoglycemia. Delivery cost for the two programs were evaluated. Factors predicting TIR in the combined cohort were determined and incorporated into a user-friendly infographic. RESULTS: First 50 graduates per group were evaluated. The mean difference in Δ HbA1c, Δ TIR and Δ episodes of severe hypoglycemia between VIRTUAL and F2F groups were 1.16 (p = 0.47), 0.76 (p = 0.78) and -0.06 (p = 0.61) respectively. Delivery cost per 50 CYPD for VIRTUAL and F2F were $5752 and $7020, respectively. The strongest predictors of TIR (n = 100) were short bursts of exercise (10-40 min) to lower hyperglycemia (p < 0.001), using trend arrow adjustment tools (p < 0.001) and adjusting pre-meal bolus timing based on trend arrows (p < 0.01). These strategies were translated into a GAME (Stop highs), SET (Stay in target), MATCH (Prevent lows) mnemonic. CONCLUSION: Teaching DynamicGM VIRTUALLY is just as effective as F2F delivery and cost saving. Short bursts of exercise and using CGM trend arrows to adjust insulin dose and timing improves TIR.

DYNAMIC: Dynamic glucose management strategies delivered through a structured education program improves time in range in a socioeconomically deprived cohort of children and young people with type 1 diabetes with a history of hypoglycemia.

OBJECTIVES: Create and evaluate the effectiveness of a structured education program in children and young people (CYP) with type 1 diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). DESIGN AND METHODS: Step 1: CGM devices were evaluated for predetermined criteria using a composite score. Step 2: The education program was developed following review of international structured education guidance, dynamic glucose management (DynamicGM) literature, award-winning diabetes educators' websites, and CGM user feedback. Step 3: Program effectiveness was assessed at six months by change in time below range (TBR) (<3.9mmol/L), time in range (TIR) (3.9-10.0mmol/L), time above range level 2 (TAR2) (>13.9mmol/L), severe hypoglycemia and HbA1c using a paired T-test. A DynamicGM score was developed to assess proactive glucose management. Factors predicting TBR and TIR were assessed using regression analysis. RESULTS: Dexcom G6 was chosen for integrated CGM (iCGM) status and highest composite score (29/30). Progressive DynamicGM strategies were taught through five sessions delivered over two months. Fifty CYP (23 male) with a mean (±SD) age and diabetes duration of 10.2 (±4.8) and 5.2 (±3.7) years respectively, who completed the education program were prospectively evaluated. Evaluation at six months showed a significant reduction in TBR (10.4% to 2.1%, p<.001), TAR2 (14.1% to 7.3%, p<.001), HbA1c [7.4 to 7.1% (57.7 to 53.8 mmol/mol), p<.001] and severe hypoglycemic episodes (10 to 1, p<.05); TIR increased (47.4% to 57.0%, p<.001). Number of Dexcom followers (p<.05) predicted reduction in TBR and DynamicGM score (p<.001) predicted increased TIR. CONCLUSION: Teaching DynamicGM strategies successfully improves TIR and reduces hypoglycemia.